KMID : 1103720110650010001
|
|
Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology 2011 Volume.65 No. 1 p.1 ~ p.8
|
|
Image Quality of the 3 Dimensional Phase-Contrast Technique in an Intracranial Magnetic Resonance Angiography with Artifacts Caused by Orthodontic Devices: A Comparison with 3 Dimensional Time-of-Flight Technique
|
|
Kang Sung-Jin
Kim Yeong-Soo Hong Hyun-Suk Kim Dong-Hun
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
Purpose:To evaluate the degree of image distortion caused by orthodontic devices during a intracranial magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), and to determine the effectiveness of the 3 dimensional phase-contrast (3D PC).
Materials and Methods: Subjects were divided into group A (n = 20) wearing a home-made orthodontic device, and group B (n = 10) with an actual orthodontic device. A 3.0T MR scanner was used, applying 3D time-of-flight (TOF) and 3D PC. Two board-certified radiologists evaluated images independently based on a four point scale classifying segments of the circle of Willis. Magnetic susceptibility variations and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) on maximum intensity projection images were measured.
Results: In group A, scores of the 3D TOF and 3D PC were 2.84 ¡¾ 0.1 vs. 2.88 ¡¾ 0.1 (before) and 1.8 ¡¾ 0.4 vs 2.83 ¡¾ 0.1 (after wearing device), respectively. In group B, the scores of 3D TOF and 3D PC were 1.86 ¡¾ 0.43 and 2.81 ¡¾ 0.15 (p = 0.005), respectively. Magnetic susceptibility variations showed meaningful results after wearing the device (p = 0.0001). CNRs of the 3D PC before and after wearing device were 142.9 ¡¾ 6.6 vs. 140.8 ¡¾ 7.2 (p = 0.7507), respectively. In the 3D TOF, CNRs were 324.8 ¡¾ 25.4 vs. 466.3 ¡¾ 41.7 (p = 0.0001).
Conclusion: The 3D PC may be a solution method for distorted images by magnetic susceptibility in the intracranial MRA compared with 3D TOF.
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
Magnetic Resonance, Angiography , Magnetic Resonance, Artifact , Magnetic Resonance, Time of Flight , Magnetic Resonance, Phase Contrast
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|